{"id":437,"date":"2010-05-03T20:04:00","date_gmt":"2010-05-04T03:04:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/?p=437"},"modified":"2010-05-03T20:04:00","modified_gmt":"2010-05-04T03:04:00","slug":"pcusa-ecumenical-statment-not-approved-by-the-usccb","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/?p=437","title":{"rendered":"PC(USA) Ecumenical Statment Not Approved By the USCCB"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Continuing with the theme of the previous post on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pcusa.org\" target=\"_blank\">Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.)<\/a>  and Roman Catholic connections, I discovered recently that one of the Ecumenical Statements approved by the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pcusa.org\/ga218\" target=\"_blank\">218th General Assembly<\/a>  and having the concurrence of a large number of the presbyteries, did not receive the approval of one of the ecumenical partners, the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.catholicbishops.org\" target=\"_blank\">U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops<\/a>  ( USCCB ).<\/p>\n<p>Now this is not recent news, but in reviewing the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pc-biz.org\/Explorer.aspx?id=3299&amp;promoID=156\" target=\"_blank\">report of the General Assembly Committee on Ecumenical Relations<\/a>  (GACER) to the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pcusa.org\/ga219\" target=\"_blank\">219th General Assembly<\/a>  as I was researching <a href=\"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/2010\/04\/23\/the-219th-general-assembly-of-the-presbyterian-church-usa--recommendations-of-the-committee-on-ecumenical-relations-regarding-the-evangelical-presbyterian-church.aspx\" target=\"_blank\">another issue<\/a>, I found that just about a year ago the USCCB declined to approve the &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.pc-biz.org\/Explorer.aspx?id=1735&amp;promoID=42\" target=\"_blank\">Mutual Recognition of Baptism with the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops<\/a>&#8221; that came out of the Catholic-Reformed Bilateral Dialogue.&nbsp; On the PC(USA) side this document was overwhelmingly approved by both the GA (voice vote) and the presbyteries (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.pcusa.org\/generalassembly\/vote08.htm\" target=\"_blank\">169-2<\/a>).&nbsp; On the USCCB side, they announced in May 2009 that it was not acceptable as it stood.&nbsp; No specifics were given in any of the information I could find but the web site of the <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.eif-pcusa.org\/EcumenicalRelations\/EcumenicalRelationsUS.html\">Ecumenical and Interfaith News Network &#8211; PCUSA<\/a>  [sic] says:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>In May 2009  the chair of the Catholic bishops&#8217; committee on ecumenical<br \/>\nand interreligious affairs reported that the<br \/>\nbishops had examined a Common<br \/>\nAgreement on Mutual Recognition of Baptism growing out of the<br \/>\nCatholic-Reformed dialogue and had &#8220;voted not to approve it in the form<br \/>\nin which it had been adopted.&#8221;&#8230;&nbsp; In order for the document to have become<br \/>\nacceptable to the bishops, changes would have been necessary that were<br \/>\nnot acceptable to the Reformed dialogue partners.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The Reformed partners issued a <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.pcusa.org\/dear\/usccb-refusal.pdf\">Statement in Response<\/a>  to the refusal.&nbsp; Having failed to be mutually agreed upon this statement gets no second chance and it is &#8220;archived,&#8221; as the terminology goes, as a historical note in this dialogue.<\/p>\n<p>What I find interesting is that for most of the PC(USA), dare I speculate 99% or more, this document is voted upon and then shelved since, <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.pcusa.org\/ecumenicalrelations\/resources\/faq-baptism-usccb.pdf\">as the FAQ indicates<\/a> , it has no substantive effect on our practice, only on how we understand the practice.&nbsp; Reinforcing this non-concern for the ecumenical statement is how &#8220;under the radar&#8221; the non-approval was.&nbsp; Yes, it was there if you were looking for it on the <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.eif-pcusa.org\/EcumenicalRelations\/EcumenicalRelationsUS.html\">EIF-PC(USA) web site<\/a>, or until recently on the <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.pcusa.org\/ecumenicalrelations\/\">GACER page<\/a>, but both using search engines as well as checking over the press release pages for the <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.pcusa.org\/pcnews\/2009\/may.htm\">PC(USA)<\/a>  and the <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.catholicbishops.org\/comm\/archives\/2009_05_arc.shtml\">USCCB<\/a>  from that time period I found nothing that &#8220;average&#8221; Presbyterians or Catholics would see in the normal course of events.&nbsp; (It might be hiding behind some cleaver headline that did not catch my attention.) I think this is relevant because the <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.pcusa.org\/ecumenicalrelations\/resources\/report-cath-reformed-bilateral-dialogue-baptism.pdf\">report<\/a>  has a section on &#8220;Pastoral Recommendations: Tangible Expressions of Mutual Recognition of Baptism.&#8221;&nbsp; Without the &#8220;mutual recognition&#8221; part do any of these &#8220;tangible expressions&#8221; change?&nbsp; In reading through the recommendations they appear pretty generic so I&#8217;m not sure anything changes there, but it would be nice to know.<\/p>\n<p>Anyway, the Ecumenical Dialogue is off to bigger and better things&#8230; The Eucharist.&nbsp; If there are still differences on Baptism I&#8217;m not sure what the next round will produce, but that is for a future GA.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Continuing with the theme of the previous post on Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) and Roman Catholic connections, I discovered recently that one of the Ecumenical Statements approved by the 218th General [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[67,4,5,102],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-437","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ecumenical","category-ga-business","category-pcusa","category-roman-catholic"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.2 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>PC(USA) Ecumenical Statment Not Approved By the USCCB - The GA Junkie<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/?p=437\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"PC(USA) Ecumenical Statment Not Approved By the USCCB - The GA Junkie\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Continuing with the theme of the previous post on Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) and Roman Catholic connections, I discovered recently that one of the Ecumenical Statements approved by the 218th General [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/?p=437\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The GA Junkie\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-05-04T03:04:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Steve Salyards\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Steve Salyards\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/?p=437#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/?p=437\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Steve Salyards\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/#\/schema\/person\/e30c1b854f165e0423ea436d3961c1c0\"},\"headline\":\"PC(USA) Ecumenical Statment Not Approved By the USCCB\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-05-04T03:04:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/?p=437\"},\"wordCount\":556,\"commentCount\":3,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"ecumenical\",\"GA business\",\"PC(USA)\",\"Roman Catholic\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/?p=437#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/?p=437\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/?p=437\",\"name\":\"PC(USA) Ecumenical Statment Not Approved By the USCCB - The GA Junkie\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-05-04T03:04:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/?p=437#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/?p=437\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/?p=437#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"PC(USA) Ecumenical Statment Not Approved By the USCCB\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/\",\"name\":\"The GA Junkie\",\"description\":\"The Politics of Presbyterianism\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/#organization\",\"name\":\"GA Junkie\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/Cross-Square.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/Cross-Square.jpg\",\"width\":1,\"height\":1,\"caption\":\"GA Junkie\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/x.com\/ga_junkie\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/#\/schema\/person\/e30c1b854f165e0423ea436d3961c1c0\",\"name\":\"Steve Salyards\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f098d5fd6e11f0399f5340bc917d2834c81c2c84247856402d200760feff0c86?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f098d5fd6e11f0399f5340bc917d2834c81c2c84247856402d200760feff0c86?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f098d5fd6e11f0399f5340bc917d2834c81c2c84247856402d200760feff0c86?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Steve Salyards\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"PC(USA) Ecumenical Statment Not Approved By the USCCB - The GA Junkie","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/?p=437","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"PC(USA) Ecumenical Statment Not Approved By the USCCB - The GA Junkie","og_description":"Continuing with the theme of the previous post on Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) and Roman Catholic connections, I discovered recently that one of the Ecumenical Statements approved by the 218th General [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/?p=437","og_site_name":"The GA Junkie","article_published_time":"2010-05-04T03:04:00+00:00","author":"Steve Salyards","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Steve Salyards","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/?p=437#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/?p=437"},"author":{"name":"Steve Salyards","@id":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/#\/schema\/person\/e30c1b854f165e0423ea436d3961c1c0"},"headline":"PC(USA) Ecumenical Statment Not Approved By the USCCB","datePublished":"2010-05-04T03:04:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/?p=437"},"wordCount":556,"commentCount":3,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/#organization"},"articleSection":["ecumenical","GA business","PC(USA)","Roman Catholic"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/?p=437#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/?p=437","url":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/?p=437","name":"PC(USA) Ecumenical Statment Not Approved By the USCCB - The GA Junkie","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-05-04T03:04:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/?p=437#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/?p=437"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/?p=437#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"PC(USA) Ecumenical Statment Not Approved By the USCCB"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/","name":"The GA Junkie","description":"The Politics of Presbyterianism","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/#organization","name":"GA Junkie","url":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/Cross-Square.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/Cross-Square.jpg","width":1,"height":1,"caption":"GA Junkie"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/x.com\/ga_junkie"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/#\/schema\/person\/e30c1b854f165e0423ea436d3961c1c0","name":"Steve Salyards","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f098d5fd6e11f0399f5340bc917d2834c81c2c84247856402d200760feff0c86?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f098d5fd6e11f0399f5340bc917d2834c81c2c84247856402d200760feff0c86?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f098d5fd6e11f0399f5340bc917d2834c81c2c84247856402d200760feff0c86?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Steve Salyards"}}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/437","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=437"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/437\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=437"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=437"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=437"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}