{"id":720,"date":"2008-10-05T19:25:00","date_gmt":"2008-10-06T02:25:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/?p=720"},"modified":"2008-10-05T19:25:00","modified_gmt":"2008-10-06T02:25:00","slug":"action-by-the-pacific-northwest-presbytery-pca-related-to-federal-vision-theology","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/?p=720","title":{"rendered":"Action By The Pacific Northwest Presbytery, PCA, Related To Federal Vision Theology"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>As long as I am on the topic of doctrine and judicial cases in the PCA, here is the latest on another&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>This past Friday, at the regular stated meeting of the Pacific Northwest Presbytery of the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pcanet.org\/\" target=\"_blank\">Presbyterian Church in America<\/a>, the Presbytery acted upon a report from a study\/examining committee concerning the doctrinal views of one of its members related to&nbsp;Federal Vision Theology.&nbsp; The controversy over this topic has been relatively quiet since things were <a href=\"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/2008\/03\/08\/decision-in-the-pca-sjc-louisiana-presbytery-case.aspx\" target=\"_blank\">settled last March<\/a> in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.louisianapresbytery.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Louisiana Presbytery<\/a> regarding the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.auburnavenue.org\/index.html\" target=\"_blank\">Auburn Avenue Presbyterian Church<\/a> in Monroe, Louisiana.&nbsp; However, the Pacific Northwest case has been active for over a year, it has just been progressing quietly in the usual Presbyterian &#8220;decently and in order&#8221; way.&nbsp; Going forward from here it may gain a higher profile.<\/p>\n<p>At this point there has been enough written about the Federal Vision Theology and controversy that I will not rehearse all of that.&nbsp; A good starting point for that is the web site <a href=\"http:\/\/www.federal-vision.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">www.federal-vision.com<\/a>, or check out <a href=\"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/categories\/Federal%20Vision.aspx\" target=\"_blank\">what I have written<\/a> over the last, almost, two years.&nbsp; This particular case began in June, 2007, when the 35th General Assembly of the PCA adopted a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.federal-vision.com\/pdf\/pcafvreport.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Study Committee Report<\/a> on &#8220;Federal Vision, New Perspective, and Auburn Avenue Theology.&#8221; In accord with the report Teaching Elder Peter Leithart immediately sent a letter to his Stated Clerk in Pacific Northwest Presbytery outlining his doctrinal views. He simultaneously <a href=\"http:\/\/www.leithart.com\/archives\/003074.php\" target=\"_blank\">published the letter on his blog<\/a> as well.&nbsp; In our usual Presbyterian fashion a study committee was established to examine TE Leithart and report back to the Presbytery on how well his views align with the Standards of the PCA.&nbsp; It is also important to point out that while TE Leithart is a member of the PCA, he serves at <a href=\"http:\/\/www.trinitykirk.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Trinity Reformed Church<\/a> in Moscow, Idaho, which is a member church of the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.crechurches.org\/\" target=\"_blank\">Confederation of Reformed Evangelical Churches<\/a> (CREC), of which many of the other Federal Vision Theology churches are now members, including Auburn Avenue.<\/p>\n<p>I will not go into details about the action of Pacific Northwest Presbytery since we have the good fortune that T.E. Jason J. Stellman, who gave the report to the Presbytery as the acting chairman of the study committee, has provided a wealth of information on his blog <a href=\"http:\/\/deregnisduobus.blogspot.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">De Regnis Duobus<\/a>.&nbsp; To briefly summarize his <a href=\"http:\/\/deregnisduobus.blogspot.com\/2008\/10\/more-on-pnw-presbyterys-leithart-debate.html\" target=\"_blank\">most detailed post<\/a>, the committee presented both a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.exile-pc.org\/docs\/leithart_majority_report.doc\" target=\"_blank\">majority report<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.exile-pc.org\/docs\/leithart_minority_report.doc\" target=\"_blank\">minority report<\/a>, Mr. Stellman being a signatory on the minority report.<\/p>\n<p>The majority report concludes:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>In the committee\u2019s view Dr. Leithart\u2019s views are<br \/>\ncompatible with the teaching of our standards though there are certainly some<br \/>\ndifferences in statement, emphasis, and elaboration. Our brief was to determine<br \/>\nwhether he denied or contradicted the teaching of our Standards, not to object<br \/>\nif he wished to say more than they say or even, in confessing the same truth,<br \/>\nto improve upon their form of words. That his positive constructions may seem<br \/>\nin some respects difficult to reconcile with the language of our standards is<br \/>\nnot itself evidence that he denies their teaching. The dialectical character of<br \/>\nbiblical teaching famously produces tensions that remain difficult, if not<br \/>\nimpossible to resolve. We further take note of the several assertions of<br \/>\nloyalty to the teaching of the Standards that are scattered among Dr.<br \/>\nLeithart\u2019s published works. He explicitly confesses his agreement with the<br \/>\nStandards\u2019 doctrine of decretal election, forensic justification, and so on.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>So, TE Leithart has some differences in doctrine, but not enough to be at odds with the Standards.<\/p>\n<p>It is interesting to note that the minority report is about the same length as the majority report, but the total length was doubled, 27 pages versus 13, by analyses included as Appendices.&nbsp; The minority report saw things differently:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>We recommend<br \/>\nthe following:<br \/>\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\n1. That Presbytery find TE Peter<br \/>\nLeithart\u2019s views, as summarized in the Minority Report, to be out of accord<br \/>\nwith the fundamentals of the system of doctrine taught in the Westminster Standards.<\/p>\n<p>2. That Presbytery direct TE Peter<br \/>\nLeithart to reconsider his views, as summarized in the Minority Report, and to<br \/>\nreport the results of this reconsideration to the next meeting of Presbytery,<br \/>\nwith the understanding that if his views continue to be out of accord with the<br \/>\nfundamentals of the system of doctrine taught in the Westminster Standards,<br \/>\nPresbytery will proceed to depose him from its ministry without censure.<br \/>\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>The Presbytery adopted the majority report.&nbsp; From Mr. Stellman&#8217;s account a major argument was &#8220;theological innovation:&#8221;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The real concern on the part of the presbyters who spoke in favor of<br \/>\nLeithart was that we not become overly narrow and that we do not<br \/>\ndiscourage bold, pioneering theology.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Since the detailed post came out <a href=\"http:\/\/deregnisduobus.blogspot.com\/2008\/10\/on-witch-hunts-red-herrings-and-false.html\" target=\"_blank\">Mr. Stellman has responded<\/a> to a public allegation that this is part of a &#8220;witch hunt&#8221; to rid the PCA of the Federal Vision Theology.<\/p>\n<p>What will happen with this case?&nbsp; The next step, according to Mr. Stellman, is to formally complain<br \/>\nagainst the Presbytery and they expect the complaint to be dismissed at the next<br \/>\nregular meeting in January.&nbsp; If dismissed the next step will be an<br \/>\nappeal to the General Assembly level where this case could look a lot<br \/>\nlike the Louisiana Presbytery one.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As long as I am on the topic of doctrine and judicial cases in the PCA, here is the latest on another&#8230; This past Friday, at the regular stated meeting [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[99,2,3,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-720","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-federal-vision","category-general-assembly","category-news","category-pca"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.2 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Action By The Pacific Northwest Presbytery, PCA, Related To Federal Vision Theology - The GA Junkie<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/?p=720\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Action By The Pacific Northwest Presbytery, PCA, Related To Federal Vision Theology - The GA Junkie\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"As long as I am on the topic of doctrine and judicial cases in the PCA, here is the latest on another&#8230; This past Friday, at the regular stated meeting [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/?p=720\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The GA Junkie\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-10-06T02:25:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Steve Salyards\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Steve Salyards\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/?p=720#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/?p=720\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Steve Salyards\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/#\/schema\/person\/e30c1b854f165e0423ea436d3961c1c0\"},\"headline\":\"Action By The Pacific Northwest Presbytery, PCA, Related To Federal Vision Theology\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-06T02:25:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/?p=720\"},\"wordCount\":888,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Federal Vision\",\"General Assembly\",\"news\",\"PCA\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/?p=720#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/?p=720\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/?p=720\",\"name\":\"Action By The Pacific Northwest Presbytery, PCA, Related To Federal Vision Theology - The GA Junkie\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-06T02:25:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/?p=720#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/?p=720\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/?p=720#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Action By The Pacific Northwest Presbytery, PCA, Related To Federal Vision Theology\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/\",\"name\":\"The GA Junkie\",\"description\":\"The Politics of Presbyterianism\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/#organization\",\"name\":\"GA Junkie\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/Cross-Square.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/Cross-Square.jpg\",\"width\":1,\"height\":1,\"caption\":\"GA Junkie\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/x.com\/ga_junkie\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/#\/schema\/person\/e30c1b854f165e0423ea436d3961c1c0\",\"name\":\"Steve Salyards\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f098d5fd6e11f0399f5340bc917d2834c81c2c84247856402d200760feff0c86?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f098d5fd6e11f0399f5340bc917d2834c81c2c84247856402d200760feff0c86?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f098d5fd6e11f0399f5340bc917d2834c81c2c84247856402d200760feff0c86?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Steve Salyards\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Action By The Pacific Northwest Presbytery, PCA, Related To Federal Vision Theology - The GA Junkie","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/?p=720","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Action By The Pacific Northwest Presbytery, PCA, Related To Federal Vision Theology - The GA Junkie","og_description":"As long as I am on the topic of doctrine and judicial cases in the PCA, here is the latest on another&#8230; This past Friday, at the regular stated meeting [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/?p=720","og_site_name":"The GA Junkie","article_published_time":"2008-10-06T02:25:00+00:00","author":"Steve Salyards","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Steve Salyards","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/?p=720#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/?p=720"},"author":{"name":"Steve Salyards","@id":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/#\/schema\/person\/e30c1b854f165e0423ea436d3961c1c0"},"headline":"Action By The Pacific Northwest Presbytery, PCA, Related To Federal Vision Theology","datePublished":"2008-10-06T02:25:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/?p=720"},"wordCount":888,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Federal Vision","General Assembly","news","PCA"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/?p=720#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/?p=720","url":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/?p=720","name":"Action By The Pacific Northwest Presbytery, PCA, Related To Federal Vision Theology - The GA Junkie","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-10-06T02:25:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/?p=720#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/?p=720"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/?p=720#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Action By The Pacific Northwest Presbytery, PCA, Related To Federal Vision Theology"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/","name":"The GA Junkie","description":"The Politics of Presbyterianism","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/#organization","name":"GA Junkie","url":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/Cross-Square.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/Cross-Square.jpg","width":1,"height":1,"caption":"GA Junkie"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/x.com\/ga_junkie"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/#\/schema\/person\/e30c1b854f165e0423ea436d3961c1c0","name":"Steve Salyards","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f098d5fd6e11f0399f5340bc917d2834c81c2c84247856402d200760feff0c86?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f098d5fd6e11f0399f5340bc917d2834c81c2c84247856402d200760feff0c86?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f098d5fd6e11f0399f5340bc917d2834c81c2c84247856402d200760feff0c86?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Steve Salyards"}}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/720","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=720"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/720\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=720"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=720"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.gajunkie.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=720"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}