Category Archives: Uncategorized

Importing Pastors — Trend Or Tradition?

I see that another respected pastor from the British Isles is once again being called to serve a church in the Philadelphia area — a tradition as old as American Presbyterianism that seems to be regaining some small measure of renewed popularity.

I speak, of course, of the Rev. Dr. William (Liam) Goligher who is the candidate to fill the vacant head of staff position at Tenth Presbyterian Church of Philadelphia.  TE Goligher is a native of Glasgow, and in addition to college there holds degrees from the Irish Baptist Theological College and Reformed Theological Seminary.  He is presently the head of staff at Duke Street (isn’t there a song by that name?) Church in London.  His impressive resume, training and theological perspectives are on display in the nice booklet the search committee has produced.  Expecting that the committee has done its work and that Rev. Goligher is called and approved by the presbytery, we wish him and his family, and Tenth, well with the pastoral relationship.

As students of American Presbyterianism can probably figure out from the title and intro, this reminds me of the colonial days, and even a bit after, when Presbyterianism was gaining a foothold on these shores and the growth was fueled by Scottish, English and Irish/Scots-Irish pastors, particularly in the Mid-Atlantic region.  Pastors such as Francis Makemie, William Tennent, Samuel and James Finley, and last but not least, John Witherspoon.  These gentlemen brought with them their experience, tradition, knowledge, formal theological training, and sometimes, as in the case of Witherspoon, their reputation.  In this list James Finley is a bit of an exception since the family immigrated when he was in his youth and his training was in the less formal setting of the colonies.

What I have found interesting in our modern setting is the renewed occasional, but high-profile, calling of ministers from Scotland.  In addition to the Rev. Goligher, recent relocations near Philadelphia also include the current President of Princeton Theological Seminary, the Rev. Iain Torrance , and at the southern end of the Mid-Atlantic region, the Rev. Richard Gibbons who took over as head of staff at First Presbyterian Church, Greenville, SC, in 2007.

I should note that while I referred to this as a “renewed” trend, I have not done a systematic search of pastoral calls in American Presbyterianism to verify this statement.  This low level of activity could easily be present throughout the history of the American church and I have just not read the right sources yet.  (Feel free to point me to sources on this.)  And as an argument to the contrary, one of the Presbyterian ministers that married my wife and I was born and educated in England, so the intervening period is not devoid of examples.

Maybe the more interesting question here is why.  Is this just the usual variation that would be found in the standard hiring process or a renewed interest in clergy with European backgrounds?  I don’t know but it seems that the same reasons don’t necessarily apply now as they did in colonial times.  As least in terms of education it is not unusual to see foreign clergy and students taking advantage of American institutions the same way that individuals from these shores look for a change of scenery, educational philosophy and perspective at schools overseas.  I will leave this as an open question, and maybe it needs to be considered on a case-by-case basis.

So, an observation that I find interesting, but one that may not actually be valid or relevant.  Having now been alerted to this in current pastoral calls I’ll keep an eye out in my future reading on church history and try to see if it is a continuing tradition or a renewed trend.

New Presbygeek Toy…

I have way too many solid Presbyterian news items to get caught up on, but being the Presbygeek that I am, this was just too good to pass up…

Yesterday Google labs released the Google Books Ngram Viewer.  (OK, those of you who are not geeky, curious, or academically oriented may want to stop reading now.)

What Google has done is to provide an interface where you can count the number of times a word or phrase occurs in some subset of their digitized Google books.  For example, the use of the word “Presbyterian” in all English language books indexed with time:

As Google describes it:

Since 2004, Google has digitized more than 15 million books worldwide.
The datasets we’re making available today to further humanities research
are based on a subset of that corpus, weighing in at 500 billion words
from 5.2 million books in Chinese, English, French, German, Russian, and
Spanish. The datasets contain phrases of up to five words with counts
of how often they occurred in each year.

and

The Ngram Viewer lets you graph and compare phrases from these datasets
over time, showing how their usage has waxed and waned over the years.
One of the advantages of having data online is that it lowers the
barrier to serendipity: you can stumble across something in these 500
billion words and be the first person ever to make that discovery.

So here are a few of my favorites from the first day of play…

You can plot multiple searches on a single graph, and the search is case sensitive, so here is Presbyterian and presbyterian for all English language sources in the database:

Unfortunately, I have not found a way yet to plot parallel usage in different languages in their interface.

One graph I really like is the usage of the phrase “Westminster Confession” in American English.  Note the spikes corresponding to the Adopting Act in 1729, an increase beginning around the time of the Plan of Union in 1801 spiking between 1810-1819, and the second spike right at the time of the Old School/New School split in 1837.  There is the longer time period in the late 1800’s following the reunion from that split and the revision of the Confession and then the discussion drops off.

But is this unique?  We can compare it with references to other, more ecumenical creeds, in American English.

It is interesting how closely the spikes in the Westminster are also seen in the Nicene Creed and how the Nicene and Athanasian in general form, ignoring the spikes, track the Westminster fairly closely.  And what about that poor Apostles’ Creed.  (or did I search on the wrong thing?)

One last one: What about different denominations.  Here is the chart for references to major Protestant denominations in American English:

Have to admit that I’m not entirely sure what to say about it other than the fact that I’m intrigued by the very close curves for the three denominations from about 1800 to 1915 or so.  I’ll leave present interpretation as an exercise for the reader, but will say that Google makes the datasets available so I’ll see about using the average of the three as a baseline and then looking at each in terms of deviations from the baseline.  Fun, fun, fun!  (I sometimes joke I’ve never met a dataset I didn’t like, but that’s not entirely true.   )

So, for those of you who also drill into this data set, let me know what interesting features or correlations you find out about Presbyterian polity and history.

Have fun!