Category Archives: news

Kirk of the Hills, Tulsa

Last night the congregation of Kirk of the Hills Church in Tulsa, OK, met and voted overwhelmingly to affirm the Session’s decisions to:

1. Disaffiliate from the PC(USA)
2. Affiliate with the EPC
3. Affirm the ordinations of Pastors Tom Gray and Wayne Hardy

If you want to read about it there is no end of information about it out there.  This is the largest PC(USA) congregaton so far to leave the denomination and it is getting wide-spread coverage.  I would refer you to:

The church’s press release about the meeting
Pastor Tom Gray’s blog and his discussion of the meeting
An article in the Tulsa World about it
And a press release issued by the PC(USA) before the meeting

There is some more information as well on the Kirk of the Hills Church web site
At least at the moment, the Eastern Oklahoma Presbytery still lists the church on their web site since the Presbytery has yet to take formal action.

I will leave it at that and let the news accounts speak for themselves.  I would note the variation between the PC(USA) press release that mentions a “handfull” of churches interested in leaving the denomination and some of the other documents that talk about up to 200.

Kirk of the Hills Church, Tulsa

Greetings,
   The situation at Kirk of the Hills developed over the weekend.  Briefly, it appears that an intended Sunday Morning “takeover’ of the church by presbytery and synod yesterday was diffused by church lawyers when the clerk of session was notified of it.  The presbytery discusses the situation this evening.

I’ve just provided the briefest of summaries since Pastor Tom Gray’s blog provides a much more detailed and first-hand account of what has happened.

Property goes to Ridgebury Presbyterian Church

In a decision by a New York Ninth Judicial District Supreme Court Justice yesterday
(August 25)  the Ridgebury Presbyterian Church of Wawayanda, NY,
in the Presbytery of Hudson River, may keep its property as it
separates from the PC(USA).  The church is happy, the presbytery
is not, the presbytery is deciding whether to appeal.

The judge based his decision on the fact that the church has held deed
to its property since 1792, before the 1983 trust clause and even
before it joined a presbytery in 1817.  One news article said the
judge relied heavily on a 1984 decision by a state Court of Appeals
decision that said a Presbyterian church in
Schenectady did not have an implied trust with its denomination. 
In fact, the judge got into theological discussion concerning the level
of “obedience” to the hierarchy of a church in a full hierarchical
system, like the Episcapalians, versus a church in a presbyterian
system.  To this the presbytery lawyer said the judge overstepped
his bounds.

So far two news articles have reported on this, one from The Times Herald-Record and one from The Journal News.  The first is more matter-of-fact, the second is a bit more sensational but has the theological info in it.

The Hudson River Presbytery has announced the news on their home page and has a link to the court decision.

Sixth General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church of Ghana

The 6th General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church of Ghana convened yesterday in Accra.  The theme of the Assembly is “Go Therefore and Make Disciples of All Nations.”

The opening session included an address by Professor
Mike Ocquaye, Minister of Communications who is also an ordained
Christian minister (denomination not specified).  According to a
Home Page Ghana news article he
“condemned the acts of homosexualism and
lesbianism that were being introduced into the Church and were
conflicting with sound doctrines of the Holy Bible.” He also said
“…since Christian doctrine had never changed, the
Church must not compromise but rather should be firm to uphold the true
gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ.”

Another speaker encouraged the church, in the interest of “going into
the whole world” of encouraging “sports evangelism,” especially using
football (soccer for those who know a football as a pointy ball game)
because of the enhanced national pride and interest occasioned by the
success of the Ghanaian team at this summer’s World Cup.

It was also announced that two new campuses of the Presbyterian University College would be opening in the next two years.

The GA continues through Wednesday

General Synod of the Bible Presbyterian Church

The reports of the 70th General Synod of the Bible Presbyterian Church,
held in Grand Island, New York, from Aug. 3-8 are now posted on the denominations web site.  I have previously commented
on their docket but they are now getting MP3’s of the sermons and
seminars online as well as the resolutions that were adopted.  It
does not appear that the actual minutes will be posted.

In looking over the eleven resolutions passed it is striking that none
of them actually deal with the operations of the denomination. 
Four are internal to the denomination:  one thanking the host
church and three are memorials to members who have gone to be with the
Lord.  The remaining seven deal with current theological debates,
some with political implications.  There are three that call upon
our
national leaders.  One is “Women in Combat,” which calls on the
government
to not place women in combat situations.  Another is “Praying in
Christ’s Name in the Military Chaplaincy,” which addresses the current
controversy of military chaplains being ordered to offer more “generic”
prayers.  Finally there is “An Argument Regarding the Duty of
Government to Safeguard the Moral and Spiritual Fabric of Society”
which I think pretty much speaks for itself.

The resolutions also address some of the recent theological
controversies.  These include the Gospel of Judas and their
declaration that it does not belong in the cannon.  In another
resolution they warned against a theological movement called the
“Federal Vision” that I am not familiar with.  They warn that this
theological perspective distorts the doctrine of justification by faith
and that it joins works and faith in the justification process. 
In addition there is a resolution expressing caution over the renewed
ecumenical work of the World Council of Churches.

But finally, the General Synod took time to comment on the 217th GA of
the PC(USA) passing of the recommendations of the PUP report. In
a resolution entitled “The Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) and the
Ordination of Those Who Violate the Seventh Commandment” the General
Synod says:

The PCUSA has thus declared the seventh commandment as “nonessential.”

and

The General Synod of the Bible Presbyterian Church, meeting in Grand Island, New York,
August 3-8, 2006, calls those within the PCUSA to follow the commands of Scripture
(2 Corinthians 6:14 – 7:1) to separate from the apostate Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) and to affiliate
with a God-honoring Presbyterian denomination that is in no way connected with the rampant
apostasy of our day.

There is a summary of all eleven resolutions.  The full text of
resolution 70:4 dealing with the PC(USA) can be found on this web page.

Property Disputes – Today’s news nothing more than a distraction

Greetings,

   One of the things that I have found fascinating as the
property dispute escalates is that the PC(USA) news service has
been absolutely silent, until today…sort of.

The PC(USA) News Service has today issued a press release trumpeting
their success in three cases in Southern California with a fourth case
pending.

HOWEVER, these cases have one thing in common which the developing
cases do not appear to have:  The all involve divided
congregations.  It is not clear that in the case of a unified
congregation wanting to leave the PC(USA) that this case law would
apply.

Furthermore, in at lease two of the cases, Torrance v. Hanmi and Serone
v. Hanmi, I’m not sure what the News Service is trumpeting.  If
you go to the LA Superior Court web site
and type in the case numbers (BC332180 and BC327134 respectively), both
cases are listed with a status of pending and the Torrance specifically
indicates pre-trial motions.  Now the Serone case may be
substantially over on July 20 when a motion for summary adjudication
was denied and the PC(USA) news service indicates that a confidential
settlement was reached.  The Torrance case is acknowledged as
going to trial so the PC(USA) is promoting success with an injunction
and pre-trial hearings.

The property dispute – continued

No sooner (pun intended) do I post the last commentary when I continue web surfing on my lunch hour and find out that not only may the advice in the legal  memos been acted upon, but that another church has  decided to leave the PC(USA) with this as a factor.

The legal memos were reportedly distributed in a closed door meeting last January.  In April, the  Eastern Oklahoma Presbytery placed affidavits on all congregational property in the presbytery.  Reports of these affidavits are from The Layman web site (April 12, 2006).  A copy of an affidavit is also available from The Layman.

I find it interesting that the report of the Trustees of Eastern Oklahoma Presbytery that is in the June 10, 2006, presbytery report packet (page 7 in the pdf) mentions a couple of things.  1)  There was definitely a property issue with the Spring Hill Presbyterian Church.  2)  The Trustees claim that The Layman Online published misinformation (I am trying to find that article) about the case. 3) There is no mention of affidavits specifically in this case, or any general application of them.  4)  The Trustees asked for the sale of now vacant property where a church that has burned down once stood with the proceeds of the sale to “be put in the Trustee’s account to cover the costs associated with other property matters.”  (Conspiracy theorists can now ask “WHAT other property matters are they preparing for?”)  The minutes of the June 10 meeting are not yet posted so any revisions to the report or the results of the vote are not on-line.

Now, fast forward to the present and Kirk of the Hills Presbyterian Church in Tulsa, the reverends Tom Gray and Wayne Hardy, co-pastors.  In his blog Tom Gray writes both about the property legal memos and implicitly how they were behind the presbytery’s affidavits.  The Layman Online reports that the presbytery response is that it was necessary in a limited number of cases but in fairness they placed the affidavit on all the churches’ property.  (Note above the June 10 trustees report, or any report at the presbytery meeting, does not mention the affidavits.)

At a session meeting last Tuesday, August 15, the elders and trustees of Kirk of the Hills voted to disaffiliate from the PC(USA) and pastors Gray and Hardy have renounced jurisdiction.  The press release declares

Yesterday the elders and the trustees of Kirk of the Hills voted to
disaffiliate from the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) denomination in
response to decisions made by the PCUSA at the national level which
depart from the authority of the Bible and the denomination’s
historical beliefs.

A congregational meeting to affirm the decision of the elders and trustees has been called for August 30.  The church intends to now affiliate with the Evangelical Presbyterian Church.

Tom Gray reflects further on these developments in his blog including todays entry.

We will see how this develops.

Will this be the PC(USA) constitutional crisis?

Well, I updated the news of the Riverside PC of Linn Grove, Iowa,
earlier today but since then a flurry of additional items have broken,
all ultimately involving property.  I’ll give you my observations
on it at the end, but here is what has become public in the last 48 hours:

  1. I have already discussed the vote at the Riverside Church and the called meeting of Prospect Hill Presbytery to address that.
  2. The Layman is reporting
    possible similar action by the Windsor Presbyterian Church of Des
    Moines, Iowa.  The church has called a congregational meeting for
    this Sunday, August 13, and any action will be considered/responded to
    at the next stated meeting of the Presbytery of Des Moines on August
    19.  Interestingly, the presbytery web site currently has a broken link to their “call” (docket?) for August 19.
  3. The PC(USA) Office of the General Assembly has just issued a new Advisory Opinion on “Implementing the Trust Clause for the Unity of the Church.”
  4. The Layman has been supplied with two PC(USA) legal documents dealing with implementing the trust clause.  One of these (“Church
    Property Disputes: A Resource for those Representing Presbyterian
    Church (U.S.A.) Presbyteries and True Churches in the Civil Courts.”) addresses civil cases the other (“Processes
    for use by presbyteries in responding to congregations seeking to
    withdraw.”) ecclisastical law.

So, where does that leave us?

I find it interesting, this outbreak of  secession in Iowa.  What is going on in the Synod of Lakes and Prairies?
But other than the coincidence of geography and the broken link on the
Presbytery of Des Moines’ web site I am willing to let this take its
course as I wrote in my post earlier today.  I pray it will be
done decently and in order, but not legalisticly and vindictively.

The new advisory opinion I find a bit more disturbing.  Is the
timing a coincidence or was OGA holding it until a real threat
arose?  While I agree with much of it, particularly point I (I.
There is not a unilateral right of a Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.)
congregation to depart from the denomination or its presbytery of
membership.), it seems to take a darker tone in point II (II. There are
also significant restrictions on how and under what circumstances a
presbytery may release a congregation.) and really sounds controlling
when you get to point III ( III. If a presbytery fails to carry out
these constitutional responsibilities, the synod may be required to
intervene.)

Finally, the two legal papers have some significant “strategy” points
to them that are due to what they are, legal discussions, as opposed to
sermons on grace and forgiveness.  I have only skimmed them but
hope to read them in more detail this weekend.  But sections of
them have a real “take no prisoners” tone to them.

So I ask again, where does this leave us?  I struggled with the
title I gave this post hoping that I was not over reacting.  But
reviewing the OGA material again, I am really left with the feeling
they are setting themselves up to win the individual battles of keeping
the buildings, but losing the war by having the membership leave the
denomination and in a way that does not bring glory to God and testify
to the grace and forgiveness Christians are to demonstrate to the
world.  The PC(USA) may end up with a lot of empty structures if
this is done wrong.

Will this be the dividing point in the PC(USA)?  I don’t
know.  If each of the presbyteries, synods, and the GA do it
right, we might end up with a smaller PC(USA) but our mutual
forbearance will be a witness to the world.  If we do it wrong,
it could get really ugly.

I will admit that I did not expect this to be the constitutional
crisis.  I hoped and prayed that the new authoritative
interpretation would get us through another two years without being
tested.  However, the pragmatist in me expected one of several
presbyteries to test the “local option” and I wanted it to play out in
the PC(USA) PJC system first before we got to the point of
congregations packing up and leaving the denomination. 
Unfortunately, it appears that some congregations are jumping to the
“end game” and trying exit strategies now.  May God grant us
wisdom and discernment in the days ahead and grace and forgiveness in
our dealings within the PC(USA).

Presbytery response to congregation leaving PC(USA)

Greetings,

  The Layman has continued it’s coverage of the developments in the vote of the congregation of Riverside Presbyterian Church in Linn Grove, Iowa.  The Layman reports, and includes the official notice, of a called presbytery meeting for next Monday, August 14.  I have been watching the Presbytery’s web site but it appears they either don’t regularly maintain it or this item has not, or will not, be posted there.  I refer you to the Layman for the full text of the article.

   I do want to comment on the notice for the presbytery meeting.  The Layman article implies that the presbytery is using strong handed tactics against the congregation.  Since the Layman has gotten a copy of the notice they probably have some additional inside specifics which I don’t have.  However, the notice appears on the surface to be what any presbyterian polity wonk would expect in this case.  The presbytery is going to be asked to form an administrative commission, our way of not making all the work be done at presbytery meetings.  That commission has the usual powers that we give it in this case:  To investigate the situation, confirm that the session and members wish to leave the PC(USA) and based upon that to determine what will happen next.  I will admit that I’m not sure the first power granted, to dissolve the pastoral relationship between pastor and congregation, is usual, but it seems reasonable here.  And of most interest to me, the commission is only granted the power to make a recommendation to presbytery about the property, not to do anything themselves.

   Let me step even further into the realm of commentary:  From reading the call for the presbytery meeting I see it as doing things decently and in order.  The congregation clearly wants to leave, we have a procedure to carry that out.  Now it is up to the commission and the presbytery to decide if it will be done decently and in order and with what measure of grace the procedure will be carried out.  It is in the carrying out of this process that our Christian faith and love will be tested and displayed to the world.  If my opinion matters, I would call on both sides to work through this process displaying the fruit of the Spirit (love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, generosity, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control) and a large measure of God’s grace.  I know that several times in my presbytery we have resorted to legalism over grace and have gotten it wrong in the process.  May it not be so here.

Blessings
Steve

Report of congregation leaving PC(USA)

The Layman web site is now carrying a report of the congregation of
Riverside Presbyterian Church in Linn Grove, Iowa, Presbytery of
Prospect Hill, voting 74-0 last Sunday (July 30) to leave the
denomination and requesting that the presbytery allow them to take
their property with them.  The congregation us upset over the
actions of the 217th GA recently concluded.  Their letter,
obtained by the Layman, says they seek “union with a confessionally
Reformed, evangelical denomination which holds to the doctrine of
Biblical inerrancy.”