Greetings,
   In looking over my blog entries I am noticing a couple of things that I thought I posted but I guess I missed.  My apologies for this.

   One of these items is a statement from the board of directors of the Presbyterian Lay Committee dated September 6, 2006, titled “A call for Presbyterian decency and order.”  The statement speaks out against the strategies outlined in the PC(USA) legal memos on property and the juxtaposition of these memos at a time when the stated clerk was promoting the PUP report.  The board writes:

On the one hand, Stated Clerk Kirkpatrick publicly called for
Presbyterians who differ to “endeavor to outdo one another in
honoring one another’s decisions.” He endorsed task force
recommendation seven, asking all church members to acknowledge their
traditional Biblical obligation, as set forth in Matthew 18:15-17,
Matthew 5:23-25, and in the Rules of Discipline in the Book of Order, “to
conciliate, mediate, and adjust differences without strife”
prayerfully and deliberately (D-1.0103) and to institute administrative
or judicial proceedings only when other efforts fail to preserve the
purposes and purity of the church.”

On the other hand, in January 2006, while Stated Clerk Kirkpatrick was
publicly advocating such peaceable procedures, his office was privately
training presbytery executives and lawyers in closed-door meetings to
take aggressive, pre-emptive legal actions against local churches whose
ministers and sessions might be prayerfully and openly seeking to
discern the Lord’s will regarding their continuing association with
the Presbyterian Church (USA) in light of recent General Assembly
actions.

The statement concludes with a call for church-wide denunciation of the legal memos and strategies.