The Layman Online is reporting that there will be a candidate coming to the stated meeting of John Knox Presbytery next week to be admitted to the candidacy process as an inquirer. The individual is a self-avowed practicing homosexual and understands that his present life style is in conflict with the ordination standards in the Book of Order, G-6.0106b.  The letter to the presbytery from the Committee on Preparation for Ministry, included in the Layman article, takes the polity view that the candidacy process is a time for the presbytery and candidate to investigate and discern the call and that the ordination standards in the Book of Order apply to the final ordination.  This is the same view that San Gabriel Presbytery took several years ago and Mission Presbytery took earlier this year, and that has so far been upheld by the Synod PJC.

The twist:
(Actually two of them.)

1)  The CPM letter also makes it clear that this request to be admitted to inquirer status will also include the new authoritative interpretation.  This is the first direct challenge to the ordination standards by a candidate for minister since the PUP report and it is clear that this candidate will declare “scruples” about whether the ordination standards are “essentials.”

2)  The big one!  The candidate in question is Mr. Scott D. Anderson, the same Scott Anderson who was the only openly homosexual member of the Theological Task Force on Peace, Unity, and Purity.  Mr. Anderson was previously an ordained minister of word and sacrament in the PC(USA) but renounced jurisdiction in 1990 when he acknowledged his present life style.

Commentary:  So much of this commentary seems to write itself, especially since the CPM does make a point of the fact that Mr. Anderson will be challenging what is essential.  I want to leave it at the point that if “nothing has changed,” as we are constantly being told, why is a member of the PUP Task Force the first to challenge the ordination standards?